Wednesday 12th December 2018

Relationships & romance

Reflections & advice on personal relationship romance in a couple

Sad couplewas something you had to work on, and you had to build it, to use a metaphor, like a house. I now think of it more like gold. In Medieval Europe, alchemists were trying to discover the philosophers' stone, the substance which they hoped would turn all metals into gold. They obviously never did. Gold is either there or isn't. It's a given. You can't create it or build it, you can only find it if you're lucky, or not find it if you're unlucky.

Or, to remain in the house metaphor, you can build, yes, but only if you've found the right foundation for your house, a solid basis of rock or stone. If you've found a sandy terrain, there's nothing you can do to make your building a success. It will always collapse in the sand under it. And then you may say to yourself: if I hadn't put that wall in that point, if I had moved it a bit to the left, or to the right, the building would have resisted.

No, if you've built on the sand the result will always be the same: the house will not resist.

a solid basis of compatibility between the two people which, again, is there or is not there.

Arguing coupleIt may depend on many factors to do with people's backgrounds, family history, childhood, genetics, experience, choices, and the general way in which people develop their personality. This fundamental compatibility that I'm talking about obviously concerns primary, vital questions, or at least so considered by the people involved.

Obvious domains will be political ideas, ethical ideas, social behaviour, attitudes towards other people, what one expects to achieve in life, how one regards love relationships and one's expectations from them, and so on.

is because he is not somebody who actually likes to discuss things. We seem to have an almost diametrically opposite way of dealing with any problem or conflict which may arise, and indeed with life in general.

He says he believes that problems are made bigger by discussing them, and he seems to believe that by ignoring them they disappear. Whereas I think that the solution and any progress lies in addressing anything directly and trying to understand it and perhaps find a rational approach and action.

It's a question of different methods really. But we're talking about different methods of living, so it's not a small thing.

a British survey of women in 1993 found two thirds would not forgive a single act of infidelity by their partners, so the quickest and easiest way to wreck a relationship is to have sex with someone else: just once will suffice in most cases. Men are slightly more tolerant of unfaithfulness. Just over half would forgive one act of infidelity, but three out of four would walk out if it happened again.

There are huge differences between men and women when it comes to relationships generally though. For example, if it came to conflict between job and relationship, only 6% of women would put the job first and almost six out of ten would choose the relationship as the priority.

 

Back to Top

 

PSYCHOLOGY